3 ms·
Microsoft's naming has generally ranged from clueless to infantile. .NET was definitely an attempt to play catch-up to everyone else in regard to the Internet,
by DavidAbrams 14y ago
Microsoft's naming has generally ranged from clueless to infantile.
.NET was definitely an attempt to play catch-up to everyone else in regard to the Internet, and even Microsoft couldn't explain what it was. We went to TechEd every year, and even attended a traveling dog-and-pony show that Microsoft held to explain .NET. We came away thinking it was distributed COM.
But then everything was named .NET. Or "My". .NET sucks, but the "My" this and "My" that was downright insulting. Yes, I know it's MY computer, because it's on MY desk. Holy shit, are those MY documents on MY computer? Who would've thought!
Then "Windows Me". WTF. Where was the enterprise version called "Windows Us"? And no, it didn't stand for "Millenium Edition", because that would've been "Windows ME".
Microsoft used to design good UIs, though. They did more to advance the GUI in the '90s than anyone else; definitely more than Apple has done to desktop GUIs since the '80s. But they've lost their way sadly over the last few years. Hopefully they can become relevant again and attract some decent design talent to replace what they've obviously lost.
And clean up this mess (this is Windows 7):
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7194/6889938667_20f136ca0b_b.jpg http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7194/6889938667_20f136ca0b_b.j...