3 ms·
>The details make this seem less of an autonomous driving issue and more of an incredibly irresponsible operation issue. In every single discussion with Tesla
by itsoktocry 3y ago
>The details make this seem less of an autonomous driving issue and more of an incredibly irresponsible operation issue.
In every single discussion with Tesla fans re: FSD, we hear that "FSD is safer NOW than human drivers", but every time there's an accident it's the driver's fault.
At what point are Tesla accountable for the mixed messaging around this product?
- samatman 3y agoThose two facts are not necessarily contradictory.
- redserk 3y agoThat's not really relevant here though as there is no claim of 100% perfection with AP/FSD, nor did I advocate for support of Tesla here. This feature requires acknowledging multiple documents staying that it may make errors and is not to be classified as an autonomous driving system. This is present when you purchase the feature, in the tutorial videos about what the car is capable of, in a screen you must read before enabling this feature, and repeated in every set of release notes that appear on each update. I fail to see why all blame for impaired driving evaporates because the manufacturer of the car is Tesla. Let's put on the Product Manager hat. How would you convey to a user that they should use a feature in a responsible manner?