4 ms·
It probably is illegal...
by staunton 3y ago
It probably is illegal...
- Towaway69 3y ago... and the fines have been factored into the bottom line.
- bluGill 3y agoIt might be legal, but in court what you advertise the car can do generally has high weight than what you put in the warning documentation. Thus Tesla is stupid for making any such claims as now they have admitted in court they think their car is fully self driving which means the car should be liable. Even if Tesla can prove that the car was under manual control the courts are still justified for finding Tesla for anything that happens as they have clearly claimed the car is self driving.
- judge2020 3y agoWhat absurd logical leaps. If this is so clearly the case, then I don't know why every single law firm in the country isn't scrambling to sue Tesla via a class-action right this minute.
- thejazzman 3y agoDon't arbitration agreements signed by most buyers the reason we'll never see any class actions here?
- bluGill 3y agoMost people have not bought a Tesla and so arbitration will not apply. Any by stander in a situation has standing to sue Tesla. Though that doesn't mean they will. Just because you can sue doesn't mean it is worth it.
- bluGill 3y agoCan you bring this up to class action? I'd expect this to more be relevant when the family of someone killed wants to sue. Or more likely the insurance company who just had to pay out some $$$ that they want to recover.
- mminer237 3y agoI agree. I just can't understand why the FTC hasn't done anything.
- RIMR 3y agoBecause it's not profitable, and the FTC actually doesn't care when mega-billionaires break the law for profit.