4 ms·
I work on a fairly complex application, and use neither of those. Besides, why would the specification for CSS take into consideration anything that's not pure
by ahmedfromtunis 3y ago
I work on a fairly complex application, and use neither of those.
Besides, why would the specification for CSS take into consideration anything that's not pure CSS. Do JS maintainers take into consideration that people are transpiling javascript from typescript/dart/...?
- lioeters 3y agoThe ECMAScript standard did consider transpiled languages - for example, by incorporating concepts from CoffeeScript like classes, destructuring, arrow functions. For sure they're considering ideas from TypeScript. I'd imagine some advances in the CSS specs are influenced by concepts from traspiled languages such as Sass, for example, variables and nested selectors.
- cqqxo4zV46cp 3y agoI don’t follow this logic at all. An idea can be rained by virtue of it first being included in a preprocessor? postcss would like to have a word.
- thr33 3y agowas just thinking this. work on a variety of complex webapps across multiple frameworks and you'd never catch me dead using css-in-js or a preprocessor.