3 ms·
> If you don't turn on your turn signal ... the car will literally steer back This kills me about BMW's lane-keep system. It doesn't just lane-keep in the ab
by kristjansson 3y ago
> If you don't turn on your turn signal ... the car will literally steer back
This kills me about BMW's lane-keep system. It doesn't just lane-keep in the absence of input, it actively fights driver input that would take it over the lane lines.
- NoPedantsThanks 3y ago[dead]
- cchance 3y agoYa no tesla disables by tapping break at all, or even twitching the steering wheel, If this was in fact a FSD crash, the driver didn't try to stop it in any way.
- brewdad 3y agoTo be fair, that is the point of lane-keep assist. To keep an inattentive driver from drifting out of their lane. Without any input to the contrary, it should assume a car leaving its lane is unintentional and try to correct it. That what it is designed to do. My Volvo has an early version of lane-keep assist (2017 model first introduced in 2015). It will fight me when it thinks I'm out of a lane. Fortunately, it doesn't take much input force to override it. It is still strong enough initially that if I were driving without holding the steering wheel appropriately it would cause a problem. Also, I must remember to turn it off if there is any snow or ice on the road surface as that tends to put the car in "kill me mode".
- pavel_lishin 3y ago> To be fair, that is the point of lane-keep assist. To keep an inattentive driver from drifting out of their lane. Without any input to the contrary, it should assume a car leaving its lane is unintentional and try to correct it. That what it is designed to do. But the whole point was that the driver explicitly turned the wheel in order to partially leave their lane, in order to give bicyclists space. They weren't drifting - they were actively steering.