There's a lot wrong with this article (both in how it is written and the evidence it presents) but implying that rising LGBT self-identification is evidence of

There's a lot wrong with this article (both in how it is written and the evidence it presents) but implying that rising LGBT self-identification is evidence of xenoestrogens while not even mentioning the vastly different social climate is kind of ridiculous. The section about countries' fertility rates is also very weird, especially the idea that attributing much of the change to culture "is unconvincing since culture would have needed to change very rapidly in virtually all nations simultaneously" -- culture demonstrably has changed very rapidly in virtually all nations simultaneously, especially in the past 30 years.