4 ms·
Yeah, I said the data was a good thing. But your critique circularly assumes there was a paradox to begin with. It's like being mystified that an object oscilla
by andrewflnr 3y ago
Yeah, I said the data was a good thing. But your critique circularly assumes there was a paradox to begin with. It's like being mystified that an object oscillating on a spring stays close to the spring's anchor point. A question as to mechanism, sure, but not a paradox.
- jibal 3y agoThere's no circularity in what I wrote, nor did I assume that there is a paradox, and the whole comment is a whatabouting deflection.