3 ms·
Software based BFI with equal 16ms on, 16ms off sounds horrible for flicker Normally it’s closer to 25% off and that is still uncomfortable to view compared to
by kiririn 3y ago
Software based BFI with equal 16ms on, 16ms off sounds horrible for flicker
Normally it’s closer to 25% off and that is still uncomfortable to view compared to plasma or CRT, unless you are blessed with a golden visual system in your brain
- wkat4242 3y agoIf you're looking to simulate a CRT that's not a problem because 50/60 Hz CRTs all had horrible flicker. We were just used to it. If you see one now you'll see how bad it is.
- beebeepka 3y agoSimulating CRT on a smeary 120 Hz LCD doesn't sound good to me. Only the latest super high refresh OLEDs are approaching that capability and the software is not done. Nobody is simulating the rays right now. Pretty niche, so progress is slow.
- theshackleford 3y agoThat’s simply not an issue. I’m not trying to simulate a CRT, I’m trying to avoid nausea inducing sample and hold blur. Which BFI does a good enough job of. Sample and hold displays including OLED are to me just both smeary messes at anything below 240hz. I also use BFI with my OLED and sure, BFI at 240hz is better but it’s not available to me in a handheld.
- theshackleford 3y agoI don’t perceive any flicker at all, not even on my CRTs and never have. But oddly, I found motion blur induced by sample and hold displays induces nausea in my system. I’m really sensitive to it for some reason.