3 ms·

With risk of sounding bad: I can ask chatgpt to summarize this for me without any human writing an article since there is ample knowledge already available. Wha

• iamgopal 3y ago
  Soon AI will be feeding itself, and gradually will degrade in performance, that time, human generated better content to feed to AI will be in demand.
  • blitzar 3y ago
    Perhaps, one day in the not too distant future there will be a revered old master in a village somewhere, who people travel from miles away to watch as they slowly and carefully write listicles the old way.
  • aeonik 3y ago
    This will be true until the models can perform science, and update their weights according to their tests.
• enoch2090 3y ago
  Totally makes sense - I'm already getting used to "ChatGPTing" instead of Googling these questions. I guess the future of these articles is that there are always fields that LLMs hallucinate at, fields that are not very common (explain the products of a small brand, pros &cons of their different models).
• nerdponx 3y ago
  Because ChatGPT is somewhere between "subtly" and "totally" wrong on most topics related to statistics and machine learning that I've tested it with. Maybe GPT 4 is better than 3.5, but I don't really trust it on technical subjects. The quality is significantly lower than a good article written by a competent human, but maybe on par with or slightly better than a trashy article written by a content farm. The advantage of the chat interface is that you can ask it clarifying questions. The real benefit of generative AI would be something like Copilot that you can interrogate for clarification as you are working through an article written by another human. That, and the other problem of AI being trained on AI until nobody knows anything anymore.