3 ms·
Partially, but here is my logic: 1. Manually programming this to automatically get meaningful feedback directly related to the documentation would require an a
by digitcatphd 3y ago
Partially, but here is my logic:
1. Manually programming this to automatically get meaningful feedback directly related to the documentation would require an agent or sifting through error logs. Otherwise, coding the patterns equivalent to support documentation is tedious manually, perhaps does not outweigh the benefits.
2. Without the ability to update the documentation directly, the system yields little benefit. Perhaps and agent trained on the codebase can (more efficiently) use automation tests based on the flow pattern rather than a visual browser agent, but it would still need the agent architecture.
- janosdebugs 3y agoAs someone who writes a fair number of docs, I would not want AI-generated wordsalad in them. AI is usually way too verbose and not to the point to be helpful. It also makes a lot of mistakes on technical products. Then again, compared to not having docs at all this may be preferable.