3 ms·
Seems to work well- I just tried it on a tiger cub vid, which I've had for years and was taken with an el-cheapo digital camera: Shaky version: http://youtu.be/
by ajb 15y ago
Seems to work well- I just tried it on a tiger cub vid, which I've had for years and was taken with an el-cheapo digital camera:
Shaky version: http://youtu.be/g5P9WwHdOSI http://youtu.be/g5P9WwHdOSI
Stabilised version http://youtu.be/wXfbRUk_1Bg http://youtu.be/wXfbRUk_1Bg
There is some motion blur (around 24 seconds, when the momma tiger lies down) which is a bit puzzling once the image has been stabilised. But hey, it's better than it was before.
- drewyeaton 15y agoThe motion blur was there in the first place, you just don't notice it because there's also _motion_. When you remove the motion (shaking, jerking the camera), you're left with just the blur.
- ajb 15y agoYes, I know. But the viewer won't know that, because they don't know where the motion was before it was stabilised.
- CoffeeAndCoffee 15y agoIt also looks like the stabilized video is magnified a little bit. Regardless, these tools are really neat and they are still in their infancy. It's good to see that GooTube still believes in user-generated content.
- modeless 15y agoCropping and magnifying the video is required for all methods of video stabilization, because otherwise you would see the edge of the original frame move in and out of view.
- nitrogen 15y agoAre there any stabilization algorithms that use other frames in the past and future to fill in the gaps with (possibly anachronistic) data?