3 ms·
Mathematical proofs need no physical evidence. They're saying something similar is accepted by some Christians. That's an internally consistent viewpoint. Us sk
by a_wild_dandan 3y ago
Mathematical proofs need no physical evidence. They're saying something similar is accepted by some Christians. That's an internally consistent viewpoint. Us skeptics simply misunderstand their irrefutable logical proof.
- Scubabear68 3y agoMath is a tool used to describe the universe, not the universe itself. The map is not the territory.
- MeImCounting 3y agoThank you for saying this. This is very true and a perspective that is all too relevant to this discussion and many others.
- a_wild_dandan 3y agoYou appear to be shadowboxing an argument where no arguments were made. If anything in my observational comment strikes you as remotely controversial or contradictory to yours, something has gone awry.