3 ms·
If you look carefully, the shakes appear too uniform to be a person shaking the camera. It looks like the camera always "shakes" in a circular motion around the
by leviathan 14y ago
If you look carefully, the shakes appear too uniform to be a person shaking the camera. It looks like the camera always "shakes" in a circular motion around the center of the original camera location.
- agumonkey 14y agoProbably a staged setup, inducing a regular shaking pattern, but I think generating rolling shutter algorithmicly would be a stretch for them, so I call physical but maybe voluntary shake.
- platz 14y agoOr maybe it's due to the 'rolling' shutter causing shear stretching as mentioned in the article
- agumonkey 14y agoBut the point is that if they faked shaking algorithmically then the original signal would be shear-free right ?
- kami8845 14y agoit's much easier to record it without much shake and then maximize the effect of their algorithm after the fact instead of recording a bunch of versions with varying degrees of shake. They completely overdid it in my opinion, the example doesn't seem authentic at all to me (though the technology remains cool)