4 ms·
Who are you responding to? I gave one reason and it’s called the inverse square law. The distances we’re talking about are unimaginably huge so the chances of a
by throwuwu 3y ago
Who are you responding to? I gave one reason and it’s called the inverse square law. The distances we’re talking about are unimaginably huge so the chances of any signal reaching us is practically zero unless it’s close by (within a few hundred light years) and intentionally directed at us with sufficient power.
- iraqmtpizza 3y ago[flagged]
- throwuwu 3y agoDespite all your bluster you obviously have no idea what you’re talking about if you think exoplanet detection techniques can tell us if there is even a single radio transmitter on that planet.
- iraqmtpizza 3y agoyou literally think that aliens are all so primitive and just happen to be completely absent from anywhere within 5000 light-years despite that being so statistically improbable it's laughable. that every alien race just happens to either be on the opposite side of the galactic core or they all abide by the Georgia Guidestones and live primitive one-planet lifestyles. how many copes do you need, honestly? either that or some people are literally incapable of grasping basic statistics. by the way, how would you have felt if you didn't have breakfast this morning?