3 ms·
This is called segmentation. People with home theatres are more likely to be willing to pay extra, so they’re squeezing those users for more money. Likewise, o
by gentleman11 3y ago
This is called segmentation.
People with home theatres are more likely to be willing to pay extra, so they’re squeezing those users for more money. Likewise, other people are more price sensitive and are more likely to be willing to watch ads to save money, so they’re squeezing them in a different way. With ai and mass surveillance in the future, companies will be able to segment at an individual level.
What would they squeeze you or your kids for one day?
- oehpr 3y agoI'm surprised the advertisers are playing ball here. Advertisers want access to people who are willing to pay more money and they want the service that does show their ads to be as accessible as possible. And they're able to more effectively negotiate for consessions as they're less diffuse. I think the fact that higher priced subscriptions that promise "no ads" exist at all is a good indication that even advertisers are losing power to monopoly gatekeepers. Following the inevitable enshitification pipeline I guess.