4 ms·
You can do that very easily right now without the need to store the DNA. So it seems like the least consequential thing you could "win" from a system that store
by buran77 3y ago
You can do that very easily right now without the need to store the DNA. So it seems like the least consequential thing you could "win" from a system that stores DNA data from every single citizen.
If we're to dig to find some upsides, you could at least come up with something like "we'd know if someone has a major genetic disorder".
- rib3ye 3y agoRight, why couldn't everything just be associated with an anonymous hash? Is that how 's CSAM matching tech works?
- zamadatix 3y agoHeads up: to anyone viewing your comment on a non-Apple device this looks like "Is that how □'s CSAM matching tech works?" because the Apple logo character uses a private character, not one actually assigned in Unicode. HN also filters "real" emoji so the only reliably working way is to spell out Apple.
- ummonk 3y agoAlso for anyone who, like me, is viewing it with an Apple device with lockdown mode enabled.
- tonyarkles 3y agoOr… just on a plain 2-year-old iPad here.