3 ms·
"...algorithmically deteriorated..." Or the person holding the camera was shaking like mad to demonstrate the abilities of the algorithm. Artistically speaking
by delinka 15y ago
"...algorithmically deteriorated..."
Or the person holding the camera was shaking like mad to demonstrate the abilities of the algorithm. Artistically speaking, shake removal is also authenticity removal. But most times, personal videos are shot by people with no eye for framing and stability. And most times, artistic (and professionals) videos are shot with an eye toward these things.
I can't foresee a reason not to keep this feature as an option rather than enforcing it on all uploads.
- leviathan 15y agoIf you look carefully, the shakes appear too uniform to be a person shaking the camera. It looks like the camera always "shakes" in a circular motion around the center of the original camera location.
- agumonkey 15y agoProbably a staged setup, inducing a regular shaking pattern, but I think generating rolling shutter algorithmicly would be a stretch for them, so I call physical but maybe voluntary shake.
- platz 15y agoOr maybe it's due to the 'rolling' shutter causing shear stretching as mentioned in the article
- agumonkey 15y agoBut the point is that if they faked shaking algorithmically then the original signal would be shear-free right ?
- kami8845 15y agoit's much easier to record it without much shake and then maximize the effect of their algorithm after the fact instead of recording a bunch of versions with varying degrees of shake. They completely overdid it in my opinion, the example doesn't seem authentic at all to me (though the technology remains cool)