4 ms·
Why do you think that? I think naming 3 of them would be better than naming 0 of them.
by bmacho 3y ago
Why do you think that?
I think naming 3 of them would be better than naming 0 of them.
- _dain_ 3y agoI don't have a textbook at hand but I remember being taught this history by physics lecturers in my undergrad. I find it strange that many people in this thread are gainsaying the existence of this narrative. It's surely a commonplace part of physics education?