> You're misinterpreting what I wrote Seems more like I interpreted what you wrote literally rather than ideologically (colloquially, as is current enforced fa

> You're misinterpreting what I wrote Seems more like I interpreted what you wrote literally rather than ideologically (colloquially, as is current enforced fashion)...seems a bit unfair that religious people can't pull a similar trick and say scripture is metaphorical and nullify all criticism. Ok, so let's consider "then it is my opinion they are just holding another religious belief": For clarity: do you believe that it is necessarily true that there is no evidence for a God? Is there some important meaning contained in "just holding another religious belief"? It seems like a phrase that is conclusive about something in some way (the "just" accentuating it, at least to my interpretation). Does personal witness count as evidence for people who believe themselves to have witnessed evidence, and if not why not (I'm getting at what seems like at least somewhat of a double standard, and there's the thorny issue of difficulty of proof of existence vs disproof in play[1]...among other things, some in your favor, and some a derivative of temporal cultural norms of cognition). [1] https://www.britannica.com/topic/black-swan-event https://www.britannica.com/topic/black-swan-event