3 ms·
But in this case, the "napkin" math of 95 years would be off by 200 years! Hardly a useful estimate for this particular topic. Still confused where you come up
by jb1991 3y ago
But in this case, the "napkin" math of 95 years would be off by 200 years! Hardly a useful estimate for this particular topic. Still confused where you come up with 105 years as an order of magnitude from 30.
- littlestymaar 3y ago> But in this case, the "napkin" math of 95 years would be off by 200 years! Which is fine, because 300 and 100 are the same order of magnitude ;). > Still confused where you come up with 105 years as an order of magnitude from 30. 30 ≈ 10^1 105 ≈ 10^2 Here you go.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]