3 ms·
independent of how you meant your comment … Phrases like that are meaningless without criteria. Even opposite extremes like “nothing is special”, vs. “everyth
by Nevermark 3y ago
independent of how you meant your comment …
Phrases like that are meaningless without criteria.
Even opposite extremes like “nothing is special”, vs. “everything is special” can be viewed as both true, given sympathetic readings of each phrase’s presumed criteria.
- Dalewyn 3y agoThe parent commenter already specified the criteria: "Humans are special because we utilize language." I am here to tell you: No, humans are not special. Yes, animals (and plants and most other lifeforms) all have some form of language. Humans are not special.
- Nevermark 3y agoWell, yes they are. No animal comes close to how we communicate and internalize our communication skills, and naturally externalize them with visual symbols, invented hand signs, etc. even before we extended all that to formal writing systems for our languages, like we are using right now. I am optimistic about whales & dolphins having some level a real of language. But best possible scenarios don’t come near us. I think you mean “communication”. Yes, even bacteria communicate, so we are not special in communicating. Which for us would include our instinctive facial and body responses, our scent, etc.
- NoPicklez 3y agoSpecial doesn't mean "we do and they don't", we both utilise language, but Humans' do it to a much higher degree. I don't see Chimpanzees typing to other Chimps across the world on a Hackernews forum. That is special and is unlike anything else in the animal kingdom.