4 ms·
Yeah, this seems obvious to me. However, out of ethical concerns, it is not obvious that the solution is to stop educating people. Perhaps just reminding would
by afarviral 3y ago
Yeah, this seems obvious to me. However, out of ethical concerns, it is not obvious that the solution is to stop educating people.
Perhaps just reminding would-be parents that if the educated and resilient stop reproducing, they are depriving the world of a thriving and resilient new generation. A clear directive that under-population is a growing concern and a few additional incentives for parents would go a long way too.
Taking a philosophical angle, why is it the "right" choice to serve our genes, the economy, or to create a younger generation to care for the elderly? It is not unethical to unburden oneself of those obligations today, but you can imagine a future where it is.