3 ms·
I'm speaking to your point about: > Common wisdom might make you think that I should be having companies throwing wads of cash at me My point is just that yo
by PheonixPharts 3y ago
I'm speaking to your point about:
> Common wisdom might make you think that I should be having companies throwing wads of cash at me
My point is just that you're misunderstanding "common wisdom". In 2016, yes a job at any FAANG would mean that you have no trouble getting a new gig. In 2024 Amazon employees do not have a great reputation, so there's no reason to think of yourself as part of a group that "common wisdom" would show preference towards. Nobody with "wads of cash" sees Amazon on a resume and thinks it's something special and worth reaching out for. FAANG in general is not as appealing as it once was, and Amazon in particular is not a strong signal at all. Someone working at OpenAI today would likely have the response you're imagining is reserved for FAANG.
Recruiters are also playing a numbers game, especially in this tech job market. My inbox has ample recruiter message for roles that are not even relevant to my skills, I wouldn't mistake that for signal.
- NoahKAndrews 3y agoI think they were saying that because they're an experienced ML engineer more than because of what companies they've worked at.
- snotrockets 3y agoAmazon, like any other big company, is a 1000 different small companies in a trenchcoat. Same for the other FAANGs. Each has just as least as many meh engineers as it has great ones.