The article doesn't mention immigration at all, it's an invisible elephant walking through the story. It's like a Victorian lady at the doctor's who can't speak

The article doesn't mention immigration at all, it's an invisible elephant walking through the story. It's like a Victorian lady at the doctor's who can't speak of improper things like legs. If the public can't be trusted with a description of the perpetrators, is it safe to tell us about the bombings at all? We may make reckless attributions.