3 ms·
Sure, but fractional people don't exist, so the wife and I have hit the replacement rate to the nearest whole person, i.e. 2. But you are quite correct, and my
by smitty1e 3y ago
Sure, but fractional people don't exist, so the wife and I have hit the replacement rate to the nearest whole person, i.e. 2.
But you are quite correct, and my usage was loosey-goosey in this context.