5 ms·

Wait so you can get the latency down to 0.6 ms end to end?

• utopcell 3y ago
  That's what a 16-sample buffer would get you. In reality, there are many devices on the market that can get close to 2.5ms. For example, Line 6 claims 2.8 ms end-to-end, BOSS claims 2.3 ms [2], the NUX B8 is at 2.5ms [3]. [1] https://line6.com/support/page/kb/relay-d-v-digital-wireless/relay-g10g10s-faq-r808 https://line6.com/support/page/kb/relay-d-v-digital-wireless... [2] https://www.boss.info/global/support/by_product/wl-20_wl-20l/support_documents/cf786345-1dd0-46c3-a2ac-350bfb4a8104/ https://www.boss.info/global/support/by_product/wl-20_wl-20l... [3] https://www.proaudiostar.com/nux-b-8-professional-2-4ghz-guitar-wireless-system-used.html https://www.proaudiostar.com/nux-b-8-professional-2-4ghz-gui...
  • polishdude20 3y ago
    What's the drawback of a 16 sample buffer over 128 samples?
    • utopcell 3y ago
      Longer buffers allow for jitter in processing further upstream. If you get a buffer every 0.6ms, you need to be able to process it always within 0.6ms.
      • polishdude20 3y ago
        Ah right that makes sense