5 ms·
We aren't arguing that it's tax fraud by definition, but that it should be considered fraud. If the tax code incentivizes destroying something then that seems l
by 2OEH8eoCRo0 3y ago
We aren't arguing that it's tax fraud by definition, but that it should be considered fraud. If the tax code incentivizes destroying something then that seems like a defect of the tax code.
- gruez 3y agoIf you re-read my prior comment, you'd see my complaint is that it's not "fraud" by any reasonable definition because deception is not involved, not that it should or should not be allowed. > "fraud" doesn't mean "losing money in a manner I don't like", so I ask again: where's the deception here?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dymk 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]