3 ms·
But you have to find time for sleeping during the day. It may be not an issue for the performers and people making money in those industries. But audience will
by mantas 3y ago
But you have to find time for sleeping during the day. It may be not an issue for the performers and people making money in those industries. But audience will shrink a lot.
- FirmwareBurner 3y agoOn the weekends, unless you have to go to work then, you can find time for sleep during the day, no?
- mantas 3y agoIf you sleep on weekends during the day, you won’t do stuff during the day. So overall it will be less participating in economy. On top of that, sticking to your circadian rhythm is important too.
- FirmwareBurner 3y ago>you won’t do stuff during the day. So overall it will be less participating in economy. Who says you're mandated to participate in the economy during your time off in the weekend daytime? You already spent money partying last night and possibly eating out takeaway and ordering an uber. Isn't that enough "for the economy"?
- mantas 3y agoThat’s what I was trying to say in my original post. More sleep means less time for the economy. Different people may allocate it differently and some may go for weird schedules. But either way it means less time consuming and less GDP generated. I’m not sure if there’s „enough“ when people want eternal GDP growth. Including pension funds etc.