3 ms·
The Wikipedia article on the subject links to many different sources and their evidence. This one seems to be a good enough summation: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh
by LeafItAlone 3y ago
The Wikipedia article on the subject links to many different sources and their evidence.
This one seems to be a good enough summation: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/waco/topten2.html https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/waco/topten2.html
People from the cult did survive, did do interviews, and even brought lawsuits. A large group was released before the fires and nine more survived the entire incident. So maybe you aren’t as familiar as you think? Furthermore, we already know more than enough about the cult from _before_ the incident. It’s pretty clear they are a nutty cult.
But, I suspect none of what I wrote above matters to you. You’ll probably still say that it’s a conspiracy and the group was a normal gathering of people, ignoring all of the evidence to the contrary. So I’m not even sure what I hope to gain from this response.
- theultdev 3y agoSorry, the ATF burned most of them to death. But you still didn't answer my question... Where is the evidence that the Davidians started the fire?
- defrost 3y agohttps://www.justice.gov/archives/publications/waco/report-deputy-attorney-general-events-waco-texas-appendix-d-arson-report https://www.justice.gov/archives/publications/waco/report-de... As addressed in the upstream PBS summary and the released report linked here, arsom investigators concluded the fire started at multiple internal ignation points simultaneously etc. etc. The report lists the physical evidence that led to that conclusion. Naturally you can assert that the report was doctored and the evidence fabricated, others can then respond and ask where is your evidence <shrug>.