3 ms·

That is a serious accusation. Care to elaborate with links and reputable sources? Otherwise, I believe you should delete your comment.

lupusreal 3y ago
That comment is important context. If its true that this guy is being harassed by multiple groups for varied reasons that substantially muddies the supposed Norm connection. The harasser's motives being as bullshit as they are varied seems likely, but it's odd for the article to lay it all at the feet of apparent Norm fans. Kind of like the article is using Norm's name to get clicks..
WangComputers 3y ago
[flagged]
- defrost 3y ago
  Thirteen years ago in a heated divorce related argument at a public pool it was claimed he threatened to kill three people by one specific withness. From the linked document he freely admitted threatening "to kill" the new boyfriend, and stated he made no such statements about his wife | unborn child. He admitted the comment was out of line and apologised. If you have nothing else then your claim about him being an "obviously unstable individual" is thin at best.
  - WangComputers 3y ago
    His own family members snitched on him because they thought he was dangerous, he was convicted of the crime, what more do you want? Don't you think domestic violence should be taken seriously? As far as being unstable goes you're free to peruse his Twitter account @StealthyGeek, search for his name on Youtube, etc. There's stuff I'd love to show you but I don't want to get banned for revealing his personal info.
    - defrost 3y ago
      > His own family members snitched on him because they thought he was dangerous A sister in law made a complaint, yes. > Don't you think domestic violence should be taken seriously? What violence? I read the report, it was claimed that he made threatening speech, he agreed but countered that it was directed at one person. He apologised. He was released after paying a bond for disorderly conduct .. thirteen years ago. Is there anything else, or are you just here to defend Kiwi Farms?

lupusreal 3y ago

That comment is important context. If its true that this guy is being harassed by multiple groups for varied reasons that substantially muddies the supposed Norm connection. The harasser's motives being as bullshit as they are varied seems likely, but it's odd for the article to lay it all at the feet of apparent Norm fans. Kind of like the article is using Norm's name to get clicks..

WangComputers 3y ago

[flagged]

defrost 3y ago
Thirteen years ago in a heated divorce related argument at a public pool it was claimed he threatened to kill three people by one specific withness. From the linked document he freely admitted threatening "to kill" the new boyfriend, and stated he made no such statements about his wife | unborn child. He admitted the comment was out of line and apologised. If you have nothing else then your claim about him being an "obviously unstable individual" is thin at best.
- WangComputers 3y ago
  His own family members snitched on him because they thought he was dangerous, he was convicted of the crime, what more do you want? Don't you think domestic violence should be taken seriously? As far as being unstable goes you're free to peruse his Twitter account @StealthyGeek, search for his name on Youtube, etc. There's stuff I'd love to show you but I don't want to get banned for revealing his personal info.
  - defrost 3y ago
    > His own family members snitched on him because they thought he was dangerous A sister in law made a complaint, yes. > Don't you think domestic violence should be taken seriously? What violence? I read the report, it was claimed that he made threatening speech, he agreed but countered that it was directed at one person. He apologised. He was released after paying a bond for disorderly conduct .. thirteen years ago. Is there anything else, or are you just here to defend Kiwi Farms?