3 ms·
Why? Police aren't required in the US to respond at all. Much less to respond in a way you find agreeable.
by sidewndr46 3y ago
Why? Police aren't required in the US to respond at all. Much less to respond in a way you find agreeable.
- advael 3y agoSo I'm confused here. The poster you're responding to here says "this shouldn't work the way that it currently does" and your response is "this currently does work that way"? Like are you saying a change in police response policy is self-evidently impossible? If not, what are you trying to say?
- sidewndr46 3y agoWhy would a group that holds power ever relinquish that power? It's also a misunderstanding in the US that police service the public. Police serve the government and exist to protect the governments interests.
- advael 3y agoOstensibly a government service is supposed to be modifiable by the will of the electorate or someone representing it. Of course we don't expect them to relinquish power voluntarily. When people propose changing policy to modify how an organization behaves, they generally do not mean by asking them nicely to please do it differently
- sidewndr46 3y agoYou just accurately summarized why "a conversation" won't result in any change around this.
- dylan604 3y agoTell them they are going to start executing the donuts every 15 minutes unless they get a bus to the airport with a fully fueled plane ready