3 ms·
I'd say it works quite well here. The author is assuming disagreement on HN is some kind of failure. I don't see it that way at all, and sometimes even make com
by lr4444lr 3y ago
I'd say it works quite well here. The author is assuming disagreement on HN is some kind of failure. I don't see it that way at all, and sometimes even make comments on opposite sides of an issue within the same issue just because I recognize compelling points in a controversial topic. It's the topics that get monopolar responses that are the least useful and interesting to me.
- pdonis 3y ago> I'd say it works quite well here. Huh? There are only two moderators here and they aren't chosen by users, nor do users have to make any choice about "trusting" them. The HN moderation system bears no resemblance at all that I can see to what the post I responded to was describing.
- CamelCaseName 3y agoWho's the second moderator? Dang and?
- pdonis 3y agoOh, that's right, dang is the only moderator now. There used to be two.