> So not what most people would consider "affordable". Yeah, this is basically "slightly less unaffordable housing". The one-bedrooms are apparently even more

> So not what most people would consider "affordable". Yeah, this is basically "slightly less unaffordable housing". The one-bedrooms are apparently even more expensive than the two-bedrooms here, which are already extortionary, about double the price they were less than a decade ago. I would know, as for our current place (two-bedroom) we started at under $1,000 per month and ended up here paying almost $2,000 per month instead. Our family of three makes $35,000 a year. It's a wonder we're not homeless.