I think the core problem with the authors analysis is that it does not ask for intensity of opinion. I think when looking at "choice" * "intensity" results wou

I think the core problem with the authors analysis is that it does not ask for intensity of opinion. I think when looking at "choice" * "intensity" results would be much more homogeneous. I think if the author accounts for intensity, results would be homogeneous and therefore the thesis of fractal disagreement would have to take backseat to a more dominating thesis, such as: It's hard to decide what's allowed because those with power don't want to have power exercised against them and use their power to gain concessions via technical readings of law rather than intent based readings of law.