I'm pointing out that this is basically "passing all the deps at once" with extra steps but no functional benefit; they are at best aesthetic, at worst confusin

I'm pointing out that this is basically "passing all the deps at once" with extra steps but no functional benefit; they are at best aesthetic, at worst confusing. I'd like a world that sacrifices a bit of aesthetics in order to erase ambiguity or confusion. So instead of putting your deps in a struct that's a param, or putting your deps in a parent closure, I'd like to put them in the function params. Though I will admit that if I had to choose, I'd use (and have used) the closure approach most often.