4 ms·
Props for throwing out some MIL-STD reference, sounds always tough and tacticool, and proclaiming a system meets those without any proof.
by hef19898 3y ago
Props for throwing out some MIL-STD reference, sounds always tough and tacticool, and proclaiming a system meets those without any proof.
- meltyness 3y agouhhh, 100ms isn't particularly stringent for a local system... nor should be the tolerance for the impact of control in a system that's literally at rest. unless we're playing soccer / free-kicks, in which case, yeah, overengineer the hell out of it, sport. ps, chapter 5 precisely specifies tolerances and minimums for things like latency of specific controls, for a control system for heavy machinery intended to be controlled by a human... and thanks for your input.