The "No Vehicles in the Park" game is not so much about the impossibility to agree on what rules to set (like "no vehicles in the park"), as it is about the amb

The "No Vehicles in the Park" game is not so much about the impossibility to agree on what rules to set (like "no vehicles in the park"), as it is about the ambiguity of rules (what is a vehicle? where does the park begin and end? are emergency vehicles OK?). Using a common sense intepretation, solves most of the "insurmountable" issues it presents, even though the way the game is setup is supposed to prove how that's impossible, in practice, real parks, with real similar restrictions, don't have those problems - or extremely rarely, and mostly with individuals with mental health issues which would contest the rules whatever they were. Apparently when it's not about contrived scenarios in test form, those issues don't really occur.