3 ms·
> Another way to think about it: they’re selling at a premium well over they bought it for. It's not a premium. It's what housing costs. If they take their "pr
by conductr 3y ago
> Another way to think about it: they’re selling at a premium well over they bought it for.
It's not a premium. It's what housing costs. If they take their "premium" and buy the next house, their tax bill is unchanged (more or less). They have to actually go find a house that is much cheaper so they can afford the tax bill.
More often than not, it causes them to move out of an area that has seen growth to an area that has not seen as much. This might be moving from Houston to a suburb of Houston, or moving from a suburb of Houston, to a small town 100 miles outside Houston.
The correct "Other way to think about it" is like telling someone this;
You bought this property when the neighborhood was worth nothing. You lived here for years when it was nothing. That might mean it was rural or crime ridden or whatever; but it was cheap and you could afford it. Good job sticking it out all those years and then letting "us" build it up around you. However, now that we've done that, we feel you are still a nothing if you can't afford the tax bill, so go find another rural/crime ridden area to live in. That's where you belong.
- no_wizard 3y agoThis ignores the prevalence of senior zoned housing and varying legal carve outs for senior housing that the state has. In practice it’s not that cut and dry