3 ms·
The car with autopilot? There's standards for control like MIL-STD-1472 which I'll bet this meets. I'm sure none of them are "the highly redundant sensor fusi
by meltyness 3y ago
The car with autopilot?
There's standards for control like MIL-STD-1472 which I'll bet this meets.
I'm sure none of them are "the highly redundant sensor fusion system with absurd levels of automation and sensing, the operator should not be able to notice any lag"
- hef19898 3y agoProps for throwing out some MIL-STD reference, sounds always tough and tacticool, and proclaiming a system meets those without any proof.
- meltyness 3y agouhhh, 100ms isn't particularly stringent for a local system... nor should be the tolerance for the impact of control in a system that's literally at rest. unless we're playing soccer / free-kicks, in which case, yeah, overengineer the hell out of it, sport. ps, chapter 5 precisely specifies tolerances and minimums for things like latency of specific controls, for a control system for heavy machinery intended to be controlled by a human... and thanks for your input.