I have enjoyed the game, although I find that it is really inconsistent with reality. The reality is that there is a judge, an authority, an enforcing body, an

I have enjoyed the game, although I find that it is really inconsistent with reality. The reality is that there is a judge, an authority, an enforcing body, and contingencies for failures of each of those. One example is that in my house, you're not allowed to use profanities around children. Who determines the profanity? I do. I'm the authority. I'm the judge. I'm also the enforcer. In the event of a rule break, a warning is given, and if the rule is accepted, it isn't spoken of again. If there's pushback against the rule, it will include an explanation of the enforcement. For this to be successful, there has to be consistent enforcement, an explanation of the authority that I hold, and the prefect execution of judgment rendered. My family knows that profanities exist, we patents use them at times privately, that people use them in different capacities, and for different reasons, yet under my direction they will not be used in my house. This isn't a value judgment of a guest's usage but one of teaching control over one's tongue while under my authority.