33 ms·
" to ensure that the total operational cost of hiring people to do these terrible jobs is much higher than using robots." He was not crushed by machinery or an
by lukan 3y ago
" to ensure that the total operational cost of hiring people to do these terrible jobs is much higher than using robots."
He was not crushed by machinery or anything:
"Dariusz worked so hard. His job used to be done by a few people during a shift, but then they made him do all that work alone, pushing around trolleys with heavy boxes."
He was simply pushed working too hard. So a robot doing the job would have been one solution - the other simply an extra human helping, or switching tasks, to something less physically demanding.
- polarix 3y agoTrue! There might be other solutions, like having management treat people as they themselves would want to be treated. That kind of thing just sounds fairly unrealistic.