3 ms·
Right. Poster doesn't dispute any of the claims, just pours FUD on. As an example, the piece is clearly identified as an "interview." Presented as a dialogue b
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Right. Poster doesn't dispute any of the claims, just pours FUD on.
As an example, the piece is clearly identified as an "interview." Presented as a dialogue between CASPAR SHALLER and MAGDA MALINOWSKA.
Poster lodges this comlaint: "I knew something was up when the author asked the subject"
- Vaslo 3y ago[flagged]
- nuclearnice3 3y agoPeople like you? Like the original post, you aren't dealing with the substance, you're just slinging insults. You are violating the first guideline. Which I reproduce here and offer you an opportunity to apologize to me: "Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes."
- Vaslo 3y ago[flagged]
- nuclearnice3 3y agoPlease don't cross into personal attack, regardless of how provocative someone is being or you feel they are. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
- PH95VuimJjqBqy 3y agoWhat does it mean to be an expert on deaths in Amazon Warehouses? She was a Union Organizer. Presumably, unions are most interested in working conditions and pay. She spoke out about the working conditions that she feels caused the death. This seems inline with what a union organizer would do, but more importantly, who the hell do you think is going to be more authoritative on this than a union organizer? What credentials do you feel she is lacking and who has the credentials such that you would be willing to defer to them as an expert?
- dang 3y agoYou started a flamewar in this thread and perpetuated it quite nastily. We have to ban accounts that do this, so please don't do it again. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
- Vaslo 3y agoMy other comments were a bit hotheaded, but where is there something in my original comment that would be grounds for me starting a flamewar? I simply stated a fact: far left magazine interviewing a union head and getting an opinion from a non-expert of warehouse deaths as cause to read with caution. This is a completely valid opinion and I am trying to make it clear that there is an agenda here beyond defending the death of a poor guy just trying to earn a buck.
- dang 3y agoWhat you're describing as "a bit hotheaded" is way over the line at which we ban accounts here, so please don't do it again. Your root comment was less bad than what you posted later, though it was obviously ideological battle, which is already flamebait.