> 'It doesn't seem like it something I would value and anyone who doesn't agree isn't an expert'. Don't even pretend you think that's what I'm trying to say. R

> 'It doesn't seem like it something I would value and anyone who doesn't agree isn't an expert'. Don't even pretend you think that's what I'm trying to say. Read my response again you need to. > There are experts in technical fields who would find value in having an AI triage patients I already said this. I'm not saying experts in technical fields cannot find value in AI; I'm saying that they have enough knowledge to be able to expose the fragility of the models. Triaging patients doesn't require expert knowledge, which is why AI can do it. > or to cross reference court cases and check arguments for them I seriously doubt that, actually. Are you, or is anyone else saying this, a lawyer? My position is that you have to be an expert to be able to evaluate the output of the models. It looking like it knows what it's talking about simply isn't enough.