4 ms·
It's an interesting question, are we in a Matrix, or computer simulation, or the slightly older theory from 1641 where Rene Descartes imagined an omnipotent dem
by DizzyDoo 14y ago
It's an interesting question, are we in a Matrix, or computer simulation, or the slightly older theory from 1641 where Rene Descartes imagined an omnipotent demon lying to him. Maybe I'm simplifying the question, but I reckon it boils down to how do we know what we know? Am I sat in front of a computer screen now, or do I just believe I am?
I'm not really a philosopher, at all, but the Oxford Companion to Philosophy says:
"Do you know that you are looking at a... book right now rather than, say, having your brain intricately stimulated by a mad scientist? The sceptic carefully describes this alternative so that no experiment can refute it. The conclusion that you really are looking at a book, however, explains the aggregate of your experiences better than the mad scientist hypothesis or any other competing views."
which I think makes sense to me. I've met one or two people who say they believe that they live in a Matrix/Alien computer simulation, but observing, they live as if they don't.
- Aqueous 14y agoKant had an interesting reply to Descartes. He said that the "world of objects in themselves" - i.e. numinal reality, or a reality independent of our perception - must exist in order for us to have experience at all. The reason? We know that there is a reality because something must persist between each one of our "computations" - our perceptions - in order for us to be able to order our perceptions in time. We just don't know anything about that reality besides that it exists. To sum up: We do live in reality at some level. How many layers we are removed from the bottom-most substrate,how many simulations-within-simulations we are in, is something we might not ever know. Kant actually said we can't ever know.