3 ms·
I think that's what they were saying (and what I would agree with). The Go std lib is very complete for important things, especially in the context of networked
by LamaOfRuin 3y ago
I think that's what they were saying (and what I would agree with). The Go std lib is very complete for important things, especially in the context of networked services. So the default is that you don't have to pull in many libraries for common needs.
- scubbo 3y ago> The Go std lib is very complete for important things Important thing like sets[0], or get-with-default from maps[1], or enums[2], or appending-to[3] or mapping-over[4] slices? [0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34018908/golang-why-dont-we-have-a-set-datastructure/34020023#34020023 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34018908/golang-why-dont... [1] https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/understanding-maps-in-go#checking-existence https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/understandi... [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14426366/what-is-an-idiomatic-way-of-representing-enums-in-go https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14426366/what-is-an-idio... [3] https://go.dev/tour/moretypes/15 https://go.dev/tour/moretypes/15 [4] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71624828/is-there-a-way-to-map-an-array-of-objects-in-go/71624929#71624929 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71624828/is-there-a-way-...
- MrDresden 3y ago> This is why I like Go and the stdlib. Its very much "do it yourself" unless we are talking about monumental libraries for very specific applications. I took this to mean that Go's stdlib required a lot of 'do-it-yourself' implementations.