3 ms·

Interesting way to get [most likely] good job applicants. Also love the picture of Jerry Yang at the end of the article.

• vaksel 18y ago
  I'm not so sure the applicants are that good. Usually the ones getting laid off are the ones from the bottom of the barrel. Of course there might have been some jewels, those who got fired due to politics or some other BS reason, and not because of competence
  • Prrometheus 18y ago
    I think you have a valid point that Yahoo! is probably not laying off their top performers. However, the job cuts were large, and there is enough randomness in the HR process to assume that the startup could find 5 good employees there. Not to mention, an employee in the bottom half at Yahoo would probably be an excellent employee anywhere else. Also, there are factors other than competence that play in to decisions like these, like tenure.
  • lacker 18y ago
    In situations like this, a lot of times a whole team gets cut. For example I think they mentioned the entire Yahoo Toolbar and Yahoo Finance teams in the U.S. were being laid off. That isn't a reflection on the skills of those engineers so much as recognizing that these products aren't mission-critical. Also, if you have to fire people, often it's easier to fire people who are more recent additions to the team, even if they are more skilled. It has less of a social impact on the rest of the company, and you lose less institutional knowledge. In short, there are plenty of reasons to believe there are great engineers being let go. Let's stay classy.