4 ms·
I don't understand. This is literally part of what the video talks about: how he got fired after giving them billions. How is this an ideological battle? It's w
by Draiken 3y ago
I don't understand. This is literally part of what the video talks about: how he got fired after giving them billions. How is this an ideological battle? It's what was described in the video.
I don't disagree that I talk about capitalism on some threads that aren't specifically mentioning it, but in this case it's 100% part of the content.
I can only hope that the same treatment happens for accounts with the opposite view.
- dang 3y agoI believe you that there was a point of contact with the article but the problem is that your comment went on a generic ideological tangent from it, straight into regular flamewar territory, which is what we're trying to avoid. The more important point, though, is the pattern of posting like this. An isolated case isn't a problem but if it becomes a pattern, that's different; that's not the intended use of this site. For sure accounts with the opposite view get the same treatment—as long as we see them. (We don't read everything that gets posted—there's far too much of it.)
- pxmpxm 3y agoPeople see what they wanna see, especially if their hobby is to promote empirically-failed worldviews. EG Moonshot research grant of $3 million / 15% of company's revenue is somehow capital exploiting labor, or whatever such superficial Das Kapital take, and no cognitive dissonance that inventions of this sort somehow didn't materialize in DDR or SSSR.