4 ms·
You're taking gradient of availability but he's talking about the fact that this gradient is dependent on pwrsonal income. You're missing his point. If a medic
by illiac786 3y ago
You're taking gradient of availability but he's talking about the fact that this gradient is dependent on pwrsonal income. You're missing his point.
If a medicine costs one million, you probably will agree it's only for the wealthy? Now, it's just a question of the price limit you assign to "reserved to the wealthy", that's all. You may have a different threshold here, but I find it hard denying there is a threshold.
- renewiltord 3y agoOh I'm not denying it, I'm celebrating it.
- illiac786 3y agoYou stating the "wealthy threshold" is not reached, you're not celebrating a threshold which has not been reached according to your standards. What you are writing in your previous answers makes little sense, it almost sound alike random words. I won't answer if the next reply doesn't make just a little sense, it feels too much like trolling on your part.