I think there can be harm done when a re-implementation, especially a heavily divergent one, takes the name of an existing program. There's a reason OpenBSD int

I think there can be harm done when a re-implementation, especially a heavily divergent one, takes the name of an existing program. There's a reason OpenBSD introduced "doas" instead of calling their new thing "sudo". Reminds me of when PowerShell decided to have "wget" and "curl" cmdlets that didn't have any of the advanced features of the originals. Naively it sounds helpful. But it introduces confusion.