3 ms·
Achieving memory safety is fine. But there are other kinds of remote code execution vulnerability. For example when the program blithely accepts some data from
by dboreham 3y ago
Achieving memory safety is fine. But there are other kinds of remote code execution vulnerability. For example when the program blithely accepts some data from an untrusted source, then executes it. We should seek to mitigate all such attacks, not just the sexy one.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- from-nibly 3y agoHuh, I guess memory safety is now the sexy security vulnerability. What was it before? SQL injection?